Friday 1 May 2015

Essay: Blade Runner and Mothra vs.Godzilla

Wrote this for school this semester. Ehhh, it turned out decent. 

DOWN WITH WORD LIMITS
2000 IS NOT ENOUGH
FIGHT THE POWER


Blade Runner and Mothra vs. Godzilla: Expressions of Economic Paranoia


            Since the inception of film, directors have been using this versatile medium to express religious, political and moral beliefs, and to convey specific emotions and feelings to their audiences. Some films overtly critique governments or dictators and have explicit allegorical messages, and others are more vague and subdued in their expressions. Two films that can be seen as expressions of fear and paranoia regarding rapid economic expansion in Japan are Ridley Scott's 1982 film Blade Runner and Ishiro Honda's 1964 "kaiju-eiga" Mothra vs Godzilla. These films were made in different decades by different directors in two very different countries and contain varying subject matter, but each one distinctly expresses fear that rapid economic growth in Japan may not have a positive effect on their respective countries. Both of them use techniques of "Othering" to portray another culture as alien and unknown and warn against the perils of rapid industrialization and economic growth.

            Ridley Scott's film Blade Runner takes place in a futuristic, dystopian version of Los Angeles. While this setting may seem familiar to the film's Western audiences, the famous city where it is set is much different than it appears in the real world. The theme of rapid industrialization and economic growth is established in one of the very first shots of the film, a landscape shot of the massive, sprawling city of Los Angeles in 2019. Huge smokestacks reach up into the sky, higher than any other buildings, and spew bright flames into the air. These smokestacks are symbols of development, progress and production, and in these shots they look quite fearsome and dangerous, depicting industrial development as something that can eventually become frightening if allowed to get out of control. Many of the early scenes of the film depict a futuristic Los Angeles that appears to be overrun with Japanese influence. Most notable are the scenes where protagonist Deckard is flying around the city, being taken to the police so they can enlist his help in finding some escaped "replicants" or synthetic human beings. In these scenes, the ship Deckard is in is shown flying through the dense, heavily populated city. Long shots show the ship cruising past a skyscraper that is almost completely covered by a giant television screen showing a close-up of a Japanese woman's face. She is clearly acting in an advertisement, and appears to be dressed in traditional Japanese attire. She is only shown from the shoulders up, but it can be seen that she is most likely wearing a kimono. She is also wearing the white, pale makeup characteristic of Japanese culture and her hair is tied up with flowers in it. The screen that the woman is on occupies a large portion of the frame when it is shown and it is clear that Scott wanted the viewer's eye to be directed to this part of the screen, despite the fact that Deckard's ship is also travelling through the shot. This massive, explicitly Japanese (the screen shows Japanese kanji text instead of English words) advertisement placed squarely in the heart of one of America's largest cities shows that in the world of Blade Runner Japan has become a very powerful nation and their culture has expanded, gaining a foothold in the United States.

            In her essay "Innovation: Japan Races Ahead as U.S. Falters", writer Constance Holden says that Japan "now sees herself at the threshold of a new era of advanced technology" (751). This essay was written in 1980, just two years before Blade Runner was made, when Japan was experiencing a massive economic boom due to their increased production of advanced technology. This contributes to Scott's portrayal of Japan as a country that is very advanced and one that has culturally crossed over the United States. He defamiliarizes Los Angeles by bringing in huge advertisements in the Japanese language and creating an atmosphere of extreme multiculturalism and claustrophobia. In the decade in which this film was made, there were concerns that Japan could become more powerful and technologically advanced than America, and Scott's film reflects this real-life paranoia by portraying a future where Japan has a huge presence in America and there are synthetic humans that are capable of escape and murder. In the film, it is also shown that Asian people work on and help create the synthetic humans. An Asian man who creates eyes for the replicants is in one scene in the film, and he is shown using chopsticks to pick up the eyes that he is working on. This "disturbing commodification of biotechnology" (Yu 54) show how the replicants (and main antagonists) of the film are created, by people from the East. This portrayal of the Japanese as a mysterious Other who creates machines that have minds of their own and the ability to kill furthers Scott's expression of Japan-related paranoia and his representation of them as an Other to be feared in Blade Runner.

            Ishiro Honda's film Mothra vs. Godzilla also expresses fear and uncertainty over rapid Japanese economic expansion and contains fearful depictions of a mysterious Other, but it does this in different ways and from a completely opposite perspective. Instead of viewing Japan as the Other, a country becoming more and more advanced that will eventually overtake and occupy America, Honda's film views Japanese economic growth from within Japan, and expresses concern that industrialization can go too far. In this monster film, a giant egg is discovered after a typhoon and is eventually revealed to have come from the beast Mothra. The egg is brought ashore and very quickly sold to Japanese businessmen. This is the first instance of Honda's film portraying industrialization as negative. In an early scene in the film, the news reporter from whose perspective the majority of the film is shown confronts the man who purchased the egg. The businessman is immediately portrayed as an unreasonable man, telling everyone to back away from his egg. When journalist Ichiro Sakai tells him that he does not think that the egg can be considered private property and he should not have been permitted to buy it, he simply says that he will share it with the public, as long as they pay him to see it. In buying the egg and using it for his own financial gain, the businessman is exploiting nature that he has no right to buy, as the egg rightfully belongs to Mothra. Jarome Shapiro notes that the industrialist "is very Western in his desire to contain or control nature, rather than live in harmony with it" (182). This is interesting, because in an inversion of Ridley Scott's representation of Japan in Blade Runner, Honda depicts Japanese economic growth as something negative that is caused by Western attitudes toward nature and development encroaching upon Japan.

            Westernized attitudes toward economic expansion is not the only thing in Honda's film that is portrayed as an Other. Godzilla is also a mysterious force that appears to be bent on dismantling Japan, a "violent, yet sympathetic, force in nature" (Shapiro 185). Interestingly enough, Japan's only defense against the destruction of Godzilla comes from the very egg that is taken over by those who seek to use it for monetary gain. This symbol of nature that is being corrupted by industrialism for the sake of corporate growth hatches into two Mothra larvae that spray silk fibers out of their mouths and bind Godzilla until he is forced to retreat back into the ocean. This battle can be seen as nature correcting itself and restoring a natural balance. Godzilla came to destroy humans and their created cities, and the Mothra larvae were sent to stop him and protect the natural order of things. If the businessmen who initially bought the egg had been allowed to have their way with it, it is possible that the egg may not have hatched into the monsters that saved the island from Godzilla and he would have been allowed to rampage endlessly, causing untold destruction.

            While Godzilla is a very distinct Other in that he is a giant creature resembling nothing in the natural world, Mothra is portrayed as an Other quite differently. In similar fashion to Ridley Scott's transposition of the modern city of Los Angeles to a fictionalized, futuristic one that is almost unrecognizable, Honda's film takes a common insect (a moth) and blows it up to massive size, creating a massive, mysterious beast out of a small, harmless creature. This defamiliarization of an organism that is already known to people in the real world creates an Other that is much different than Godzilla, who is also much more mysterious in his purpose. Godzilla exists to destroy, but Mothra's role in the film is that of a guardian. Yet another group of Others in this film are the native people that inhabit the island where Mothra lives. These people appear to know a great deal about what goes on in the outside world and say that Godzilla is the Japanese people's own fault, their consequence for "playing with the devil's fire", an obvious reference to nuclear tests and experimentation. This can be seen as another critique of Japanese industrialization and economic growth having negative effects, as the leader of the tribe of natives talks about how their island used to be a beautiful, green place before the experiments began. Nuclear experimentation was a controversial subject at the time, just as biological engineering and cloning are both now and when Blade Runner came into existence.

            Blade Runner and Mothra vs. Godzilla are two films that appear very different on the surface. The only immediately apparent similarity between them is the fact that they are both easily recognizable as films in the science fiction genre. However, despite the different countries of origin and being made almost two decades apart from one another, they both contain very interesting commentary on the rapid economic growth that was occurring in Japan between 1964 and 1982. Each of these films expresses paranoia and fear related to Japanese industrialization in different ways, and from different cultural perspectives. In addition to this, both films have their own ways of "Othering" specific cultures or monsters in their respective universes, making them appear mysterious or dangerous. Ridley Scott and Ishiro Honda each made a film that is distinctly different from the other's, but both of these works contain similar subtexts in reference to Japan.



Works Cited
Holden, Constance. "Japan Races Ahead as U.S. Falters." Science. vol. 210. Nov 14,         1980. pp. 751-754. Web. Apr 4 2015.
           
Shapiro, Jerome. "When a God Awakes: Symbolism in Japan's Mysterious Creature           Movies." World and I. vol. 13.5. May 1998. pp. 182. Web. Apr 5 2015.

Yu, Timothy. "Oriental Cities, Postmodern Futures: Naked Lunch, Blade Runner and       Neuromancer." MELUS.  vol. 33. pp.45-71. 2008. Web. Apr 4 2015.